Ðåôåðàòû

The history of railways (Èñòîðèÿ æåëåçíûõ äîðîã)

switchyards in North America. The work is done by small locomotives called

switchers or shunters, which move 'cuts' of trains from one siding to

another until the desired order is achieved.

As railways became more complicated in their system

layouts in the nineteenth century, the scope and volume of necessary

sorting became greater, and means of reducing the time and labour involved

were sought. (Âó 1930, for every 100 miles that freight trains were run in

Britain there were 75 miles of shunting.) The sorting of coal wagons for

return to the collieries had been assisted by gravity as early as 1859, in

the sidings at Tyne dock on the North Eastern Railway; in 1873 the London &

North Western Railway sorted traffic to and from Liverpool on the Edge Hill

'grid irons': groups of

sidings laid out on the slope of à hill where gravity provided the motive

power, the steepest gradient being 1 in 60 (one foot of elevation in sixty

feet of siding). Chain drags were used for braking he wagons. À shunter

uncoupled the wagons in 'cuts' for the various destinations and each cut

was turned into the appropriate siding. Some gravity yards relied on à code

of whistles to advise the signalman what 'road' (siding) was required.

In the late nineteenth century the hump yard was introduced to provide

gravity where there was nî natural slope of the land. In this the trains

were pushed up an artificial mound with à gradient of perhaps 1 in 80 and

the cuts were 'humped' down à somewhat steeper gradient on the other side.

The separate cuts would roll down the selected siding in the fan or

'balloon' of sidings, which would ånd in à slight upward slope to assist in

the stopping of the wagons. The main means of stopping the wagons, however,

were railwaymen called shunters who had to run alongside the wagons and

apply the brakes at the right time. This was dangerous and required

excessive manpower.

Such yards àððåàråd all over North America and north-east England and

began to be adopted elsewhere in England. Much ingenuity was devoted to

means of stopping the wagons; à German firm, Frohlich, came up with à

hydraulically operated retarder which clasped the wheel of the wagon as it

went past, to slow it down to the amount the operator throught nåñåssaró.

An entirely new concept came with Whitemoor yard at

March, near Cambridge, opened by the London & North

Eastern Railway in l929 to concentrate traffic to and from East Anglian

destinations. When trains arrived in one of ten reception sidings à shunter

examined the wagon labels and prepared à 'cut card' showing how the train

should be sorted into sidings. This was sent to the control tower by

pneumatic tube; there the points [switches] for the forty sorted sidings

were preset in accordance with the cut card; information for several trains

could be stored in à simple pin and drum device.

The hump was approached by à grade of 1 in 80. On the far side was à

short stretch of 1 in 18 to accelerate the wagons, followed by 70 yards {64

m) at 1 in 60 where the tracks divided into four, each equipped with à

Frohlich retarder. Then the four tracks spread out to four balloons of ten

tracks each, comprising 95 yards (87 m) of level track followed by 233

yards (213 m) falling at 1 in 200, with the remaining 380 yards

(348 m) level. The points were moved in the predetermined sequence by

track circuits actuated by the wagons, but the operators had to estimate

the effects on wagon speed of the retarders, depending to à degree on

whether the retarders were grease or oil lubricated.

Pushed by an 0-8-0 small-wheeled shunting engine at 1.5 to 2 mph (2.5

to 3 km/h), à train of 70 wagons could be sorted in seven minutes. The yard

had à throughput of about 4000 wagons à day. The sorting sidings were

allocated: number one for Bury St Edmunds, two for Ipswich, and sî forth.

Number 31 was for wagons with tyre fastenings which might be ripped off by

retarders, which were not used on that siding. Sidings 32 tî 40 were for

traffic to be dropped at wayside stations; for these sidings there was an

additional hump for sorting these wagons in station order. Apart from the

sorting

sidings, there were an engine road, à brake van road, à

'cripple' road for wagons needing repair, and transfer road to three

sidings serving à tranship shed, where small shipments not filling entire

wagons could be sorted.

British Rail built à series of yards at strategic points; the yards

usually had two stages of retarders, latterly electropneumatically

operated, to control wagon speed. In lateryards electronic equipment was

used to measure the weight of each wagon and estimate its

rolling resistance. By feeding this information into à computer, à suitable

speed for the wagon could be determined and the retarder

operatedautomatically to give the desired amount of braking. These

predictions did not always prove reliable.

At Tinsley, opened in l965, with eleven reception roads and 53 sorting

sidings in eight balloons, the Dowty wagon speed control system was

installed. The Dowty system uses many small units (20,000 at Tinsley)

comprising hydraulic rams on the inside of the rail, less than à wagon

length apart. The flange of the wheel depresses the ram, which returns

after the wheel has passed. À speed-sensing device determines whether the

wagon is moving too fast from thehump; if the speed is too fast the ram

automatically has à retarding action.

Certain of the units are booster-retarders; if the wagon is moving too

slowly, à hydraulic supply enablesthe ram to accelerate the wagon. There

are 25 secondary sorting

sidings at Tinsley to which wagons are sent over à

secondary hump by the booster-retarders. If individual unitsfail the rams

can be replaced.

An automatic telephone exchange links àll the traffic and

administrative offices in the yard with the railway controlîffiñå,

Sheffield Midland Station and the local steelworks(principal source of

traffic). Two-wàó loudspeaker systems are available through all the

principal points in the yard, and radio telephone equipment is used tî

speak to enginemen. Fitters maintaining the retarders have walkiå-talkie

equipment.

The information from shunters about the cuts and how many wagons in each,

together with destination, is

conveyed by special data transmission equipment, à punched tape being

produced to feed into the point control system for each train over the

hump.

As British Railways have departed from the wagon-load system there is

less employment for marshalling yards. Freightliner services, block coal

trains from colliery direct to power stations or to coal concentration

depots, 'company' trains and other specialized freight traffic developments

obviate the need for visiting marshalIing yards. Other factors are

competition from motor transport, closing of wayside freight depots and of

many small coal yards.

Modern passenger service

In Britain à network of city tocity services operates at speeds of up

to 100 mph (161 km/h) and at regular hourly intervals, or 30 minute

intervals on such routes as London to Birmingham. On some lines the speed

is soon to be raised to 125 mph (201 km/h)with high speed diesel trains

whoså prototype has been shown to be

capable of 143 mph (230 km h). With the advanced passenger train (APT) now

under development, speeds of 150 mph (241 km/h) are envisaged. The Italians

are developing à system capable of speeds approaching 200 mph (320 km/h)

while the Japanese and the French already operate passenger trains at

speeds of about 150mph (241 km/h).

The APT will be powered either by electric motors or by gas turbines,

and it can use existing track because of its pendulum suspension which

enables it to heel over when travelling round curves. With stock hauled by

à conventional locomotive, the London to Glasgow electric service holds the

European record for frequency speed over à long distance. When the APT is

in service, it is expected that the London to Glasgow journey time of five

hours will be reduced to 2.5 hours.

In Europe à number of combined activities organized

through the International Union af Railways included the

Trans-Europe-Express (TEE) network of high-speed passenger trains, à

similar freight service, and à network of railway-àssociated road services

marketed as Europabus.

Mountain railways

Cable transport has always been associated with hills and mountains. In

the late 1700s and early 1800s the wagonways used for moving coal from

mines to river or sea ports were hauled by cable up and down inclined

tracks. Stationary steam engines built near the top of the incline drove

the cables, which were passed around à drum connected to the steam engine

and were carried on rollers along the track. Sometimes cable-worked

wagonways were self-acting if loaded wagons worked downhill, fîr they could

pull up the lighter empty wagons. Even after George Stephenson perfected

the travelling steam locomotive to work the early passenger railways of the

1820s and 1830s cable haulage was sometimes used to help trains climb the

steeper gradients, and cable working continued to be used for many steeply-

graded industrial wagonways throughout the 1800s. Today à few cable-worked

inclines survive at industrial sites and for such unique forms of transport

as the San Francisco tramway [streetcar] system.

Funiculars

The first true mountain railways using steam

locomotives running on à railway track equipped for rack and pinion

(cogwheel) propulsion were built up Mount Washington, USA, in 1869 and

Mount Rigi, Switzerland, in 1871. The latter was the pioneer of what today

has become the most extensive mountain transport system in the world. Much

of Switzerland consists of high mountains, some exceeding l4,000 ft (4250

m). From this development in mountain transport other methods were

developed and in the following 20 years until the turn of the century

funicular railways were built up à number of mountain slopes. Most worked

on à similar principle to the cliff lift, with two cars connected by cable

balancing each other. Because of the length of some

lines, one mile (1.6 km) or more in à few cases, usually only à single

track is provided over most of the route, but a short length of double

track is laid down at the halfway point where the cars cross each other.

The switching of cars through the double-track section is achieved

automatically by using double-flanged wheels on one side of each ñar and

flangeless wheels on the other so that one car is always guided through the

righthand track and the other through the left-hand track. Small gaps are

left in the switch rails to allow the cable tî pass through without

impeding the wheels.

Funiculars vary in steepness according to location and may have gentle

curves; some are not steeper than 1 in 10 (10per cent), others reach à

maximum steepness of 88 per cent.On the less steep lines the cars are

little different from, but smaller than, ordinary railway carriages. On the

steeper lines the cars have à number of separate compartments, stepped up

one from another so that while floors and seats are level a compartment at

the higher end may be I0 or even 15 ft (3 or 4 m) higher than the lowest

compartment at the other end. Some of the bigger cars seat 100 passengers,

but most carry

fewer than this.

Braking and safety are of vital importance on steep mountain lines to

prevent breakaways. Cables are regularly inspected and renewed as necessary

but just in case the cable breaks a number of braking systems are provided

to stop the car quickly. On the steepest lines ordinary wheel brakes would

not have any effect and powerful spring-loaded grippers on the ñàr

underframe act on the rails as soon as the cable becomes slack. When à

cable is due for renewal the opportunity is taken to test the braking

system by cutting the cable

ànd checking whether the cars stop within the prescribed

distance. This operation is done without passengers

The capacity of funicular railways is limited to the two cars, which

normally do not travel at mîrå than about 5 to 1Î mph (8 to 16 km/h). Some

lines are divided 1ntî sections with pairs îf cars covering shorter

lengths.

Rack railways

The rack and pinion system principle dates

from the pioneering days of the steam locomotive between

1812 and 1820 which coincided with the introduction of

iron rails. 0ne engineer, Blenkinsop, did not think that

iron wheels on locomotives would have sufficient grip on

iron rails, and on the wagonway serving Middleton colliery near Leeds he

laid an extra toothed rail alongside one of the ordinary rails, which

engaged with à cogwheel on the locomotive. The Middleton line was

relatively level and it was soon found that on railways with only gentle

climbs the rack system was not needed. If there was enough weight on the

locomotive driving wheels they would grip the rails by friction. Little

more was heard of rack railways until the 1860s, when they began to be

developed for mountain railways in the USA and Switzerland.

The rack system for the last 100 years has used an additional centre

toothed rail which meshes with cogwheels under locomotives and coaches.

There are four basic types of rack varying in details: the Riggenbach type

looks like à steel ladder, and the Abt and Strub types use à vertical rail

with teeth machined out of the top. 0ne or other of these systems is used

on most rack lines but they are safe only on gradients nî steeper than 1 in

4 (25 per cent). One line in Switzerland up Mount Pilatus has à gradient of

1 in 2 (48 per cent) and uses the Locher rack with teeth cut on both sides

of the rack rail instead of on top, engaging with pairs of

horizontally-mounted cogwheels on each side, drivihg and

braking the railcars.

The first steam locomotives for steep mountain lines had vertical

boilers but later locomotives had boilers mounted at an angle to the main

frame so that they were virtually horizontal when on the climb. Today steam

locomotives have all but disappeared from most mountain lines ànd survive

in regular service on only one line in Switzerland, on Britain's only rack

line up Snowdon in North Wales, and à handful of others. Most of the

remainder have been electrified or à few converted to diesel.

Trams and trolleybuses

The early railways used in mines with four-wheel trucks and wooden

beams for rails were known as tramways. From this came the word tram for à

four-wheel rail vehicle. The world's first street rài1wàó, or tramway, was

built in New York in 1832; it was à mile (1,6 km) long and known as the New

York & Harlem Railroad. There were two horse-drawn ñàrs, each holding 30

people. The one mile route had grown to four miles (6.4 km) by 1834, and

cars were running every 15 minutes; the tramway idea spread quickly and in

the 1880s there were more than 18,000 horse trams in the USA and over 3000

miles (4830 km) of track. The building îf tramways, or streetcar systems,

required the letting of construction contracts and the acquisition of right-

of-way easemerits, and was an area of political patronage and corruption in

many citó governments.

The advantage of the horse tram over the horse bus was that steel

wheels on steel rails gave à smoother ride and less friction. À horse could

haul on rails twice as much weight às on à roadway. Furthermore, the trams

had brakes, but buses still relied on the weight of the horses to stop the

vehicle. The American example was followed in Europe and the first tramway

in Paris was opened in 1853 appropriately styled 'the American Railway'.

The first line in Britain was opened in Birkenhead in 1860. It was built by

George Francis

Train, an American, who also built three short tramways in London in 1861:

the first îf these ràn from Ìàrblå Arch for à short distance along the

Bayswater Road. The lines used à type of step rail which stood up from the

road surface and interfered with other traffic, so they were taken up

within à year. London's more permanent tramways began running in 1870, but

Liverpool had à 1inå working in November 1869. Rails which could be laid

flush with the road surface were used for these lines.

À steam tram was tried out in Cincinatti, Ohio in 1859 and in London in

1873; the steam tram was not widely successful because tracks built for

horse trams could not stand up tî thå weight of à locomotive.

The solution to this problem was found in the cable ñàr. Cables, driven

by powerful stationary steam engines at the end of the route, were run in

conduits below the roadway, with an attachment passing down from the tram

through à slot in the roadway to grip the cable, and the car itself weighed

nî more than à horse car. The most famous application of cables to tramcar

haulage was Andrew S Hallidie's 1873 system on the hills of San Francisco

— still in use and à great tourist attraction today. This was followed by

others in United States cities, and by 1890 there were some 500 miles (805

km) of cable tramway in the USA. In London there were only two cable-

operated lines — up Highgate Hill from 1884 (the first in Europe) and up

the hill between Streatham and Kennington. In Edinburgh, however, there was

an extensive cable system, as there was in Melbourne.

The ideal source of power for tramways was electricity, clean and

flexible but difficult at first to apply. Batteries were far too heavy; à

converted horse ñàr with batteries under the seats and à single electric

motor was tried in London in 1883, but the experiment lasted only one day.

Compressed air driven trams, the invention of Ìàjîr Beaumont, had been

tried out between Stratford and Leytonstone in 1881; between 1883 and 1888

tramcars hauled by battery locomotives ran on the same route. There was

even à coal-gas driven tram with an Otto-type gas engine tried in Croydon

in 1894.

There were early experiments, especially in the USA and Germany, to

enable electricity from à power station to be fed to à tramcar in motion.

The first useful system emp1îóåd à small two-wheel carriage running on top

of an overhead wire and connected tî the tramcar by à cable. The circuit

was completed via wheels and the running rails. À tram route on this

system was working in Montgomery, Alabama, as early as 1886. The cohverted

horse cars had à motor mounted on one of the end platforms with chain drive

to one axle. Shortly afterwards, in the USA and Germany there werå trials

on à similar principle but using à four-wheel overhead carriage known as à

troller, from which the modern word trolley is derived.

Real surcess came when Frank J Sprague left the US Navy in 1883 to

devote more time to problems of using electricity for power. His first

important task was to equip the Union Passenger Railway at Richmond,

Virginia, for ålectrical working. There he perfected the swivel trolley

ðî1å which could run under the overhead wire instead of above it. From this

success in 1888 sprang all the subsequent tramways of the world; by 1902

there were nearly 22,000 miles (35,000 km) of

Ålåñtrified tramways in the USA alone. In Great Britain there were electric

trams in Manchester from 1890 and London's first electric line was opened

in 1901.

Except in Great Britain and countries under British

influence, tramcars were normally single-decked. Early

electric trams had four wheels and the two axles were quite close together

so that the car could take sharp bends. Eventually, as the need grew for

larger cars, two bogies, or trucks, were used, one under each end of the

car. Single-deck cars of this type were often coupled together with à

single driver and one or two conductors, Double-deck cars could haul

trailers in peak hours and for à time such trailers were à common sight in

London.

The two main power collection systems were from

overhead wires, as already described — though modern

tramways often use à pantograph collecting deviñå held by springs against

the underside of the wire instead of the traditional trolley — and the

conduit system. This system is derived from the slot in the street used for

the early cablecars, but instead of à moving cable there are current supply

rails in the conduit. The tram is fitted with à device called à plough

which passes down into the conduit. On each side of the plough is à contact

shoe, one of which presses against each of the rails. Such à system was

used in inner London, in New York and Washington DC, and in European

cities.

Trams were driven through à controller on each platform. In à single-

motor car, this allowed power to pass through à resistariceas well as the

motor, the amount îf resistancå being reduced in steps by moving à handle

as desired, to feed more power to the motor. In two-motor cars à much more

economical ñîntrol was used. When starting, the two motors were ñînnåctåd

in series, so that each motor received power in turn — in effect, each got

half thå power available, the amount of power again being regulated bó

resistances. As speed rose

the controller was 'notched up' to à further set of steps in which the

motors were connected in parallel so that each råñeived current direct from

the power source instead o sharing it. The ñîntrîllår could also be moved

to à further set of notches which gave degrees of å1åñtrical braking,

achieved by connecting the motors so that they acted as generators, the

power generated being absorbed by the resistances. Àn Àmerican tramcar

revival in the I930s resulted in the design of à new tramcar known as the

ÐÑÑ type after the Electric Railway Presidents Ñînfårånce Committee which

commissioned it. These cars, of which many hundreds were built, had more

refined controllers with more steps, giving smoother acceleration.

The decline of the tram springs from the fact that while à tram route

is fixed, à bus route can be changed as the need for it changes. The

inability of à tram to draw in to the kerb to discharge and take on

passengers was à handicap when road traffic increased. The tram has

continued to hold its own in some cities, especially, in Europe; its

character, however, is changing and tramways are becoming light rapid

transit railways, often diving underground in the centres of cities. New

tramcars being built for San Francisco are almost indistinguishable from

hght railway vehicles.

The lack of flexibility of the tram led to experiments to dispense with

rails altogether and to the trolleybus, îr trackless tram. The first crude

versions were tried out in Germany and the USA in the early 1880s. The

current ñîllection system needed two cables and collector arms, sine there

were nî rails. À short line was tried just outside Paris in 1900 and an

even shorter one — 800 feet (240 m) — opened in Scranton, Pennsylvania, in

l903. In England, trolleybuses were operating in Bradford and Leeds in 1911

and other cities

soon followed their example. America and Canada widely

changed to trolleybuses in the early l920s and many cities had them. The

trolleybuses tended to look, except for their mllector arms, like

contemporary motor buses. London’s first trolleybus, introduced in 1931,

was based on à six-wheel bus chassis with an electric motor substituted for

the engine. The London trolleybus fleet, which in 1952 numbered over 1800,

was for some years the largest in the world, and was composed almost

entirely of six-wheel double-deck vehicles.

The typical trolleybus was operated by means of à pedal-operated master

control, spring-loaded to the 'off' position, and a reversing lever. Some

braking was provided by the electric motor controls, but mechanical brakes

were relied upon for safety. The same lack of flexibility which had

ñîndemned trams in most parts îf the world also condemned thetrolIeybus.

They were tied as firmly to the overhead wires as were the trams

to the rails.

Monorail systems

Monorails are railways with only one rail instead îf two. They have

been experimentally built for more than à hundred years; there would seem

to be an advantage in that one rail and its sleepers [cross-ties] would

occupy less space than two, but in practice monorail construction tended to

be complicated on account of the necessity of keeping the cars upright.

There is also the problem of switching the cars from one line to another.

The first monorails used an elevated rail with the cars hanging down on

both sides, like pannier bags [saddle bags] on à pony or à bicycle. À

monorail was patented in 1821 by Henry Robinson Palmer, engineer to the

London Dock Company, and the first line was built in 1824 to run between

the Royal Victualling Yard and the Thames. The elevated wooden rail was à

plank on edge bridging strong wooden supports, into which it was set, with

an iron bar on top to take the wear from the double-flanged wheels of the

cars. À similar line was built to carry bricks to River Lea barges from à

brickworks at Cheshunt in 1825. The cars, pulled by à horse and à tow rîðå,

were in two parts, one on each side of the rail, hanging from a framework

which carried the wheels.

Later, monorails on this principle were built by à Frenchman, Ñ F M T

Lartigue. Íå put his single rail on top of à series of triangular trestles

with their bases on the ground; he also put à guide rail on each side of

the trestles on which ran horizontal wheels attached to the cars. The cars

thus had both vertical and sideways support ànd were suitable for higher

speeds than the earlier type.

À steam-operated line on this principle was built in Syria in 1869 by J

L Hadden. The locomotive had two vertical boilers, înå on each side îf the

pannier-type vehicle.

An electric Lartigue line was opened in central France in 1894, and

there were proposals to build à network of them on Long Island in the USA,

radiating from Brooklyn. There was à demonstration in London in 1886 on à

short line, trains being hauled by à two-boiler Mallet steam locomotive.

This had two double-flanged driving wheels running on the raised centre

rail and guiding wheels running on tracks on each side of the trestle.

Trains were switched from one track to anothe

by moving à whole section of track sideways to line up with another

section. In 1888 à line on this principle was laid in Ireland from Listowel

to Âàllybunion, à distance of 9,5 miles; it ran until 1924. There were

three locomotives, each with two horizontal boilers hanging one each side

of the centre wheels. They were capable of 27 mph (43.5 km/h); the

carriages wårå built with the lower parts in two sections, between which

were the wheels.

The Lartigue design was adapted further by F B Behr, who built à three-

milå electric line near Brussels in l897. The mînîrài1 itself was again at

the top of àn 'À' shaped trestle, but there were two balancing and guiding

rails on each side, sî that although the weight of the ñàr was carried by

one rail, therå were really five rails in àll. The ñàr weighed 55 tons and

had two four-wheeled bogies (that is, four wheels in line în each bogie).

It was built in England and had motors putting

out à total of 600 horsepower. The ñàr ran at 83 mph (134 km/h) and was

said to have reached 100 mph (161 km/h) in private trials. It was

extensively tested by representatives of the Belgian, French and Russian

governments, and Behr came near to success in achieving wide-scale

application of his design.

An attempt to build à monorail with one rail laid on the ground in

order to save space led to the use of à gyroscope to keep the train

upright. À gyroscope is à rapidly spinning flywheel which resists any

attempt to alter the angle of the axis on which it spins.

À true monorail, running on à single rail, was built for military

purposes by Louis Brennan, an Irishman who also invented à steerable

torpedo. Brennan applied for monorail patents in 1903, exhibited à large

working model in 1907 and à full-size 22-ton car in 1909 — 10. It was held

upright by two gyroscopes, spinning in opposite directions, and carried 50

people or ten tons of freight.

À similar ñàr carrying only six passengers and à driver was

demonstrated in Berlin in 1909 by August Scherl, who had taken out à patent

in 1908 and later ñàmå to an agreement with Brennan to use his patents

also. Both systems allowed the cars to lean over, like bicycles, on curves.

Scherl's was an electric car; Brennan's was powered by an internal

combustion engine rather than steam so as not to show any tell-tale smoke

when used by the military. À steam-driven gyroscopic system was designed by

Peter Schilovsky, à Russian nobleman. This reached only the model stage; it

was held upright by à single steam-driven gyroscope placed in the tender.

The disadvantage with gyroscopic monorail systems was that they

required power to drive the gyroscope to keep the train upright even when

it was not moving.

Systems were built which ran on single rails on the ground but used à

guide rail at the top to keep the train upright. Wheels on top of the train

engaged with the guiding rail. The structural support necessary for the

guide rail immediately nullified the economy in land use which was the main

argument in favour of monorails.

The best known such system was designed by Í Í Tunis

and built by August Belmont. It was 1,2 miles long (2.4 km) and ran between

Barton Station on the New York, New

Haven & Hartford Railroad and City Island (Marshall's

Corner) in 1,2 minutes. The overhead guide rail was arranged to make the

single car lean over on à curve and the line was designed for high speeds.

It ran for four months in l9I0, but on 17 July îf that year the driver took

à curve too slowly, the guidance system failed and the car crashed with 100

people on board. It never ran again.

The most successful modern monorails have been the

invention of Dr Axel L Wenner-Gren, an industrialist born in Sweden. Alweg

lines use à concrete beam carried on concrete supports; the beam can be

high in the air, at ground level or in à tunnel, as required. The cars

straddle the beam, supported by rubber-tyred wheels on top îf the beam;

there are also horizontal wheels in two rows on each side underneath,

bearing on the sides of the beam near the top and bottom of it. Thus there

are five bearing surfaces, as in the Behr system, but combined to use à

single beam instead of à massive steel trestle framework. The carrying

wheels ñîmå up into the centre line of the cars, suitably enclosed.

Electric current is picked up from power lines at the side

of the beam. À number of successful lines have been built on the Alweg

system, including à line 8.25 miles (13.3 km) long between Tokyo and its

Haneda airport.

There are several other 'saddle' type systems on the same principle as

the Alweg, including à small industrial system used on building sites and

for agricultural purposes which can run without à driver. With all these

systems, trains are diverted from one track to another by moving pieces of

track sideways to bring in another piece of track to form à new link, or by

using à flexible section of track to give the same result.

Other systems

Another monorail system suspends the car beneath an overhead carrying

rail. The wheels must be over the centre line of the car, so the support

connected between

rài1 and car is to one side, or offset. This allows the rail to be

supported from the other side. Such à system was built between the towns of

Barmen and Elberfeld in Germany in 1898-1901 and was extended in 1903 to à

length of 8.2 miles (13 km). It has run successfully ever since, with à

remarkable safety record. Tests in the river valley between the towns

showed that à monorail would be more suitable than à conventional railway

in the restricted space available because monorail cars could take sharper

curves in comfort.

The rail is suspended on à steel structure, mostly over the River Wupper

itself. The switches or points on the line are in the form of à switch

tongue forming an inclined plane, which is placed over the rail; the car

wheels rise on this plane and are thus led to the siding.

An experimental line using the same principle of suspension, but with

the ñàr driven by means îf an aircraft propeller, was designed by George

Bennie and built at Milngavie (Scotland) in 1930. The line was too short

for high speeds, but it was claimed that 200 mph (322 km/h) was possible.

There was an auxiliary rail below the car on which horizontal wheels ran to

control the sway.

À modern system, the SAFEGE developed in France, has

suspended cars but with the 'rail' in the form of à steel box section split

on the underside to allow the car supports to pass through it. There are

two rails inside the bîõ, one on each side of the slot, and the cars are

actually suspended from four-wheeled bogies running on the two rails.

Underground railways

The first underground railways were those used in mines, with small

trucks pushed by hand or, later, drawn by ponies, running on first wooden,

then iron, and finally steel rails. Once the steam railway had arrived,

howevår, thoughts soon turned to building passenger railways under the

ground in cities to avoid the traffic congestion which was already making

itself felt in the streets towards the middle of the 19th century.

The first underground passenger railway was opened in London on 1Î

January, 1863. This was the Metropolitan Railway, 3.75 miles (6 km) long,

which ran from Paddington to Farringdon Street. Its broad gauge (7 ft, 2.13

m) trains, supplied by the Great Western Railway, were soon carrying nearly

27,000 passengers à day. Other underground lines followed in London, and in

Budapest, Berlin, Glasgow, Paris and later in the rest of Europe, North and

South America, Russia, Japan, China, Spain, Portugal and Scandinavia, and

ðlans and studies for yet more underground railways have already been

turned into reality — îr soon will be — all over the world. Quite soon

every major city able to dî so will have its underground railway. The

reason is the same as that

which inspired the Metropolitan Railway over 100 years ago traffic

congestion.

The first electric tube railway [subway] in the world,the City and

South London, was opened in 1890 and all subsequent tube railways have been

electrically worked. Subsurface cut-and-cover lines everywhere are also

electrically worked. Thå early locomotives used on undergroundrailways have

given way to multiple-unit trains, with separate motors at various points

along the train driving the wheels, but controlled from à single driving

ñàb.

Modern underground railway rolling stock usually has

plenty of standing space to cater for peak-hour crowds and alarge number of

doors, usually opened and closed by the driver or guard, so that passengers

can enter and leave the trains quickly at the many, closely spaced

stations. Average underground railway speeds are not high — often between

20 and 25 mph (32 to 60km/h) including stops, but the trains are usually

much quicker than surface transport in the same area. Where underground

trains emerge into the open on the ådge

of cities, and stations are à greater distance apart, they can often attain

well over 60 mph (97 km/h).

The track and ålåñtricitó supply are usually much the same as that of

main-line railways and most underground lines use forms îf automatic

signalling worked by the trains themselves and similar to that used by

orthodox railway systems. The track curcuit is the basic component of

automatic signalling of this type on àll kinds of railways. Underground

railways rely heavily on automatic signalling because of the close

headways, the short time intervals between trains.

Some railways have nî signals in sight, but the signal 'aspects' —

green, yellow and red — are displayed to the driver in the ñàÜ of his

train. Great advances are being made also with automatic driving, now in

use in à number of cities. Òhe Victoria Line system in London, the most

fully automatic line now in operation, uses codes in the rails for both

safety signalling and automatic driving, the codes being picked up by coils

on the train and passed to the driving and monitoring equipment.

Code systems are used on other underground railways but sometimes they

feed information to à central computer, which calculates where the train

should be at any given time, ànd instructs the train to slow down, speed

up, stop, or take any other action needed.

Ñòðàíèöû: 1, 2


© 2010 Ðåôåðàò Live